Aruba
Very high structural capacity, prosperity matched by institutions.
What stands out
Select any label for its definition and scoring rule.
Structural shape
Each spoke shows one pillar, with 0 at the center and 1 at the edge. The shape reveals whether the pillars are similar or whether one is much lower than the others. That difference is called the .
Read as Some imbalance · spread 0.21
Additional checks
0 flagged · 2/9 assessedThese checks add context that the overall score can miss. Select a check to see its result, the evidence behind it, and whether enough information was available to assess it.
These two checks run automatically from the five pillars and public source data.
These checks need reviewed historical or political context. A result of “not assessed” means that review has not been completed.
These checks describe structural risk. They do not predict who will act first in a conflict. Differences smaller than 0.03 are treated as too close to rank when countries are compared head-to-head.
Additional diagnostics
governance context has not been reviewedthe reviewed context is mixed, incomplete, or changing.
No structural risk flags.
Largest difference across the weighting methods: 0.030. The country stays in the same score band in each check.
Try a different profile
Move a pillar to see how the overall score would change. You can also test different pillar weights. The published score uses equal weights of 20 percent each.
This tool changes the five published pillar values or their weights. It does not recalculate the pillars from the raw indicators, and it does not update the additional checks shown above.
The indicators behind the score
3/5 pillars · 2024Not measured: Economic Complexity, Human Capital
Select an indicator to see what it measures and where it comes from.