How countries hold up under stress
Compare how countries are equipped to handle political and economic stress. Every score comes from public data and a fixed formula. Open a country to see its five pillars, its data gaps, and the checks that affect its reading.
190 countries scored23 in the highest score bandformula MI v3.3 · reproducible
New here? Start with what this measures →
Each country scores from 0 to 1. A higher score indicates greater measured capacity to handle stress. Bands are score ranges, not forecasts.
Band 1Very high capacity0.80+23Band 2High capacity0.60 to 0.7971Band 3Mixed capacity0.40 to 0.5974Band 4Low capacity0.20 to 0.3922Band 5Very low capacity0.00 to 0.190
Select a country on the map to see its score and open its profile. Small countries and island states, including Singapore and San Marino, may be easier to find in the list below.
Browse every country
Open the atlas →190 shown
Singapore0.88
● Band 1
Switzerland0.87
● Band 1
Finland0.84
● Band 1
Denmark0.84
● Band 1
Ireland0.84
● Band 1
Sweden0.83
● Band 1
Netherlands0.82
● Band 1
Germany0.82
● Band 1
Japan0.82
● Band 1
New Zealand0.81
● Band 1
Norway0.81
● Band 1resource dependent
Canada0.81
● Band 1
Iceland0.80
● Band 1
South Korea0.80
● Band 1
Austria0.80
● Band 2
United Kingdom0.79
● Band 2
Belgium0.78
● Band 2
United States0.78
● Band 2
Australia0.78
● Band 2resource dependent
Estonia0.78
● Band 2
Slovenia0.77
● Band 2
France0.77
● Band 2
Czech Republic0.77
● Band 2
United Arab Emirates0.76
● Band 2
Lithuania0.76
● Band 2
Portugal0.75
● Band 2
Cyprus0.75
● Band 2
Italy0.74
● Band 2
Israel0.74
● Band 2
Spain0.73
● Band 2
Latvia0.72
● Band 2
Poland0.72
● Band 2
Slovakia0.72
● Band 2
Uruguay0.72
● Band 2
Croatia0.70
● Band 2
Hungary0.70
● Band 2
Romania0.70
● Band 2
Qatar0.69
● Band 2institutions lag incomeresource dependent
Saudi Arabia0.69
● Band 2institutions lag income
Chile0.69
● Band 2
Costa Rica0.69
● Band 2
Greece0.69
● Band 2
Bulgaria0.69
● Band 2
Malaysia0.68
● Band 2
Mauritius0.68
● Band 2
Oman0.67
● Band 2institutions lag income
North Macedonia0.66
● Band 2
Montenegro0.66
● Band 2
Bahrain0.66
● Band 2institutions lag incomeresource dependent
China0.66
● Band 2
Panama0.66
● Band 2institutions lag income
Albania0.65
● Band 2
Argentina0.63
● Band 2institutions lag income
Serbia0.63
● Band 2institutions lag income
Moldova0.63
● Band 2
Georgia0.63
● Band 2institutions lag income
Jordan0.62
● Band 2
Kazakhstan0.62
● Band 2institutions lag income
Kuwait0.62
● Band 2institutions lag incomeresource dependent
Trinidad and Tobago0.62
● Band 2institutions lag income
Belarus0.61
● Band 2institutions lag income
Turkey0.61
● Band 2institutions lag income
Botswana0.61
● Band 2
Thailand0.61
● Band 2institutions lag income
Mexico0.61
● Band 2institutions lag income
Vietnam0.60
● Band 2
Dominican Republic0.60
● Band 2institutions lag income
Armenia0.60
● Band 3institutions lag income
Namibia0.60
● Band 3
Morocco0.59
● Band 3
Philippines0.59
● Band 3
Paraguay0.59
● Band 3
El Salvador0.59
● Band 3
Bosnia-Herzegovina0.58
● Band 3institutions lag income
Cabo Verde0.58
● Band 3resource dependent
Eswatini0.58
● Band 3
Brazil0.58
● Band 3institutions lag income
Jamaica0.57
● Band 3
Russia0.57
● Band 3institutions lag income
Colombia0.57
● Band 3institutions lag income
Indonesia0.57
● Band 3institutions lag income
Mongolia0.56
● Band 3institutions lag income
South Africa0.56
● Band 3institutions lag income
Tunisia0.56
● Band 3institutions lag income
Cambodia0.56
● Band 3
India0.56
● Band 3
Peru0.55
● Band 3institutions lag income
Uzbekistan0.55
● Band 3
Laos0.55
● Band 3
Ecuador0.55
● Band 3institutions lag income
Azerbaijan0.55
● Band 3institutions lag incomeresource dependent
Ukraine0.55
● Band 3institutions lag income
Kyrgyzstan0.54
● Band 3resource dependent
Sri Lanka0.54
● Band 3institutions lag income
Egypt0.53
● Band 3institutions lag income
Senegal0.53
● Band 3
Gabon0.52
● Band 3institutions lag income
Turkmenistan0.51
● Band 3institutions lag incomeresource dependent
Algeria0.51
● Band 3institutions lag incomeresource dependent
Kenya0.51
● Band 3
Tajikistan0.50
● Band 3
Ghana0.50
● Band 3
Guatemala0.50
● Band 3institutions lag income
Malawi0.50
● Band 3
Benin0.50
● Band 3
Tanzania0.50
● Band 3
Bolivia0.49
● Band 3institutions lag income
Iran0.49
● Band 3institutions lag incomeresource dependent
Togo0.48
● Band 3
Uganda0.48
● Band 3
Rwanda0.47
● Band 3
Nepal0.47
● Band 3
Nicaragua0.47
● Band 3institutions lag income
Honduras0.47
● Band 3institutions lag income
Mauritania0.46
● Band 3institutions lag incomeresource dependent
Zambia0.46
● Band 3resource dependent
Bangladesh0.46
● Band 3institutions lag income
Zimbabwe0.46
● Band 3institutions lag income
Madagascar0.46
● Band 3
Iraq0.45
● Band 3institutions lag income
Angola0.45
● Band 3institutions lag incomeresource dependent
Cote d'Ivoire0.45
● Band 3institutions lag income
Equatorial Guinea0.43
● Band 3institutions lag income
Guinea0.42
● Band 3institutions lag income
Libya0.42
● Band 3institutions lag income
Papua New Guinea0.42
● Band 3institutions lag income
Pakistan0.41
● Band 3institutions lag income
Afghanistan0.40
● Band 3
Republic of the Congo0.40
● Band 4institutions lag incomeresource dependent
Niger0.40
● Band 4
Liberia0.40
● Band 4resource dependent
Haiti0.39
● Band 4institutions lag income
Mozambique0.39
● Band 4resource dependent
Cameroon0.38
● Band 4institutions lag income
Burkina Faso0.38
● Band 4institutions lag incomeresource dependent
Nigeria0.37
● Band 4institutions lag income
Burundi0.37
● Band 4resource dependent
Myanmar0.37
● Band 4institutions lag income
Ethiopia0.36
● Band 4institutions lag income
Mali0.32
● Band 4institutions lag income
Chad0.30
● Band 4institutions lag incomeresource dependent
Sudan0.30
● Band 4institutions lag income
DR Congo0.27
● Band 4institutions lag income
Luxembourg0.91
● Band 1· 3/5 data
Andorra0.87
● Band 1· 3/5 data
Greenland0.87
● Band 1· 3/5 data
Cayman Islands0.85
● Band 1· 3/5 data
San Marino0.85
● Band 1· 3/5 data
Bermuda0.84
● Band 1· 3/5 data
Macao0.84
● Band 1· 3/5 data
Hong Kong0.83
● Band 1· 3/5 data
Aruba0.83
● Band 1· 3/5 data
Barbados0.79
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Bahamas0.79
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Malta0.78
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Seychelles0.78
● Band 2· 3/5 data
US Virgin Islands0.78
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Bhutan0.78
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Antigua and Barbuda0.78
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Palau0.77
● Band 2· 3/5 data
St Kitts and Nevis0.77
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Puerto Rico0.74
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Nauru0.73
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Marshall Islands0.72
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Kiribati0.69
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Maldives0.66
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Vanuatu0.66
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Suriname0.64
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Sao Tome and Principe0.63
● Band 2· 3/5 data
Fiji0.63
● Band 2· 4/5 data
Guyana0.59
● Band 3· 3/5 datainstitutions lag incomeresource dependent
Gambia0.58
● Band 3· 3/5 data
Kosovo0.58
● Band 3· 3/5 datainstitutions lag income
Cuba0.57
● Band 3· 4/5 data
Solomon Islands0.57
● Band 3· 3/5 dataresource dependent
Djibouti0.56
● Band 3· 3/5 data
Lesotho0.56
● Band 3· 3/5 data
Comoros0.53
● Band 3· 3/5 data
Sierra Leone0.51
● Band 3· 3/5 data
East Timor0.50
● Band 3· 4/5 data
Lebanon0.47
● Band 3· 4/5 data
Palestine0.47
● Band 3· 3/5 data
Guinea-Bissau0.47
● Band 3· 3/5 dataresource dependent
Venezuela0.40
● Band 4· 4/5 data
Eritrea0.38
● Band 4· 3/5 data
Syria0.36
● Band 4· 3/5 datainstitutions lag income
Central African Republic0.36
● Band 4· 3/5 dataresource dependent
Yemen0.31
● Band 4· 4/5 data
South Sudan0.29
● Band 4· 3/5 data
Somalia0.24
● Band 4· 4/5 datainstitutions lag income
190 of about 195 states are scored. Countries without enough source data are labeled unmeasured and are not assigned an estimated score.