Modernization Index
← Country atlas

Kuwait

High structural capacity, prosperity outrunning institutions, lopsided (economic complexity the weak point).

0.624
Band 2 · High capacity

What stands out

Select any label for its definition and scoring rule.

P1InstitutionsP2ComplexityP3Human cap.P4EconomyP5Stability

Structural shape

Each spoke shows one pillar, with 0 at the center and 1 at the edge. The shape reveals whether the pillars are similar or whether one is much lower than the others. That difference is called the .

Read as Lopsided · spread 0.39

Additional checks

1 flagged · 2/9 assessed

These checks add context that the overall score can miss. Select a check to see its result, the evidence behind it, and whether enough information was available to assess it.

Data-based checks

These two checks run automatically from the five pillars and public source data.

Case-specific checks

These checks need reviewed historical or political context. A result of “not assessed” means that review has not been completed.

These checks describe structural risk. They do not predict who will act first in a conflict. Differences smaller than 0.03 are treated as too close to rank when countries are compared head-to-head.

Additional diagnostics

governance context has not been reviewed
Governance approach
No clear classification

the reviewed context is mixed, incomplete, or changing.

Structural risk
lowfrom the scoring formula's structural checks
  • · Watch: 0.390 gap between the highest and lowest pillars
  • · Flagged checks: resource dependence
Weighting check · score under 4 sets of weights
0.624
Equal weights
0.648
Time-varying weights
0.615
Correlation weights
0.603
Archived manual weights

Largest difference across the weighting methods: 0.045. The country stays in the same score band in each check.

Try a different profile

Move a pillar to see how the overall score would change. You can also test different pillar weights. The published score uses equal weights of 20 percent each.

0.625
Band 2 · High capacity
published score
P1InstitutionsP2ComplexityP3Human cap.P4EconomyP5Stability
0.56
0.42
0.81
0.61
0.71

This tool changes the five published pillar values or their weights. It does not recalculate the pillars from the raw indicators, and it does not update the additional checks shown above.

External security context

reviewed for 1989
0.82high
threats from outside the country
No major ally identified
whether a credible ally was expected to defend it
0.48moderate
capacity to respond after an external shock

HIGH structural exposure with NO standing deterrent, but a RESPONSE patron intervened to reverse the shock after it landed: survival came from outside help, not internal strength (e.g. Kuwait 1990, conquered then restored by the coalition).

What happened: Invaded by Iraq 2 Aug 1990; sovereignty restored by the coalition Feb 1991. SURVIVED via the response patron.

The indicators behind the score

5/5 pillars · 2024
57.7
60.9
61.2
52.3
46
28.1
0.1
0.3
0.7
0.9
52,444
70.9
44.3
29.3

Select an indicator to see what it measures and where it comes from.

Countries with similar pillar profiles

These countries have the closest five-pillar pattern to Kuwait. Similarity does not mean that their politics or histories are the same.

Compare Kuwait head-to-head with any country →